八年来，坚强的男孩赫苏斯一直呆在地下的军事基地里度日，自从启示录战争爆发后就再也没有回到地面，与赫苏斯困在一起的还有其他八个精英队员，领导人玛丽亚和她的情人巴勃罗;同性恋卢卡斯和助手;天文学家马格达莱纳和少女安娜;士兵佩德罗和寂寞的犹太人，他们负责保卫这里的安全。陆地已经由核辐射所变异的丧尸大军占领，他们不仅要时刻准备为尸群入侵而战斗，还要处处提防着各种未知鬼怪的突然袭击，可以说他们每日都在恐惧的阴影下度过。不仅如此,他们还要解决因自身内部的矛盾,如果稍有差池他们便会招致瞬间灭亡的惨剧。但无论如何，他们所奉行的只有一个原则：为了生存而生存。也许他们是人类在宇宙中唯一的一群幸存者……　　影评:此电影虽然不太出名，但却获得过国际影展六项大奖，被称为次世代恐怖悬疑片的里程碑。本片以极低的成本拍摄出了好来屋级大片效果，无论是画面还是声效都极具震撼力，阴柔的灯光特效和演员的演技将影片所表现出的恐惧绝望感发挥的淋漓尽致，骇人听闻的故事内容（情节与人物名字皆参考圣经）与离奇的怪物设定也是本片的一大看点。此片悬念部分做的非常出色，片子把所有伏笔都埋在了最后，所以不到最后一刻你是不会知晓事件真相的，到时影片所展现出的魄力绝对会把观众震惊。

　　向阳中学高中生乔利旬，在一次意外中变成植物人。18年后乔利旬醒来 ，发现父亲去世，只给他留下 一个价值3000万的房子，以及一封“必须考上大学才能继承家产”的遗书 。四十岁的乔利旬不得不重新走进校园，考取大学以获得遗产。重新入学后，乔利旬发现自己18年前一夜风流留下的孩子李醒成为了他的同班同学， 还有个坏学生张铁棍处处跟他作对。在班主任严老师的帮助下，乔利旬克服了学习困难，得到了李醒的认可，也感化了张铁棍。在高考前夕，开发商用500万诱惑乔利旬放弃高考。一番思想斗争后，乔利旬决定放弃500万，遵循了和李醒的约定，毅然迈向了考场。

　　在某知名律师事务所供职的石田彻子（吉田羊 饰）的生活、事业、爱情顺风顺水，宛如童话中的女主人公一般。谁曾想，平稳的生活因为某个人突然到来而瞬时逆转。这一天，名叫小谷夏子（木村佳乃 饰）的女人找上门来，希望彻子接手她的诉讼委托。夏子是彻子亲戚家的孩子，她刚刚和未婚夫解除婚约，并希望彻子帮她讨要相关赔偿费。在费了九牛二虎之力解决这桩委托后，夏子居然不支付任何委托费用凭空从彻子面前消失。兴许被对方的霉运所感染，彻子随即遇到一连串挫折。先是被丈夫提出离婚，接着工作上状况频出，更为此饱受上司斥责。蹉跎之际，消失的夏子再度出现，她居然厚颜无耻地再度请求彻子接受委托涉及价值高达200万日元的梵高名画的委托……　　本片根据桂望实的小说改编。

马修（乔纳森·塔克 Jonathan Tucker 饰）是一位懵懂又内敛的大学新鲜人，和大部分同龄的孩子们一样，他的内心里保留着对未来的光明的美好憧憬。某日，马修搭载的电梯突然遭遇停电，电梯内一片黑暗，一个看不清面目的女孩和马修一同被困在电梯之中。　　患难见真情，闭塞的空间里，马修和女孩之间产生了奇妙的化学反应，两人慢慢靠近，最终肌肤相亲。一夜过去，当马修想要看看这个女孩的面孔之时，女孩早已经离开。就这样，马修陷入了单恋之中，单恋一个同他发生过关系他却连她是谁也不知道的女孩，他唯一知道的是，这个女孩一定住在女生宿舍之中，马修决定将她给找出来

　　半野喜弘の初監督映画『雨にゆれる女』が、2016年に公開される。　　同作は、エレクトロニックミュージックやオーケストラ作品に加え、ホウ・シャオシェン監督、ジャ・ジャンクー監督らの映画音楽など、国内外で幅広い作品を手掛ける音楽家・半野喜弘が、自身のオリジナル脚本を映画化した作品。「飯田健次」という別名を名乗り、毎朝眼鏡と補聴器で変装してから職場に向かう孤独な男・則夫が、秘密を抱えた女を家に預かったことをきっかけに、次第に彼女に惹かれていき、「健次」でいられなくなっていく、というストーリーだ。　　過去に犯した過ちから別人として生活し、他人との関わりを避けて生きる主人公の則夫を演じるのは、映画『るろうに剣心』シリーズの相楽左之助役などで知られる青木崇高。闇を抱え、共に自分自身を語らない則夫と惹かれ合う謎の女役を、出演作『天の茶助』『忘れ雪』などの公開を控える大野いとが演じる。　　半野は、映画監督に挑戦した理由について「音楽というのはとても抽象的な芸術です。より人間そのもの、物語を描きたいと思った時、それが映画でした」とコメント。また、青木と大野の起用理由については、「誰も知らない青木崇高、誰も知らない大野いとを描けると思ったからです。青木くんは豪快なようで非常に繊細で緻密な人物。大野さんには蝶が羽化する直前のような危うさと強さを感じます。この映画の中で、きっと未だ見ぬ2人を観てもらえるはずです」と語っている。　　なお、同作ではクラウドファンディングプラットフォーム「Motion Gallery」で4月30日まで製作費の一部を募るプロジェクトを実施中。支援のリターンには、映画完成時の打ち上げへの招待や、半野主催の音楽イベントへの招待、撮影小道具のプレゼントなどが用意されている。

　　灵感少女夜宵因交通事故失去了双亲，母亲的灵魂还在事故时被恶灵夺走，为了找回夜宵母亲的灵魂，拥有通灵体质的萤多朗和夜宵一起前往恶灵弥漫的灵异地点。

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　根据英国作家格林的同名小说改编。纳粹占领时期的法国人。因为纳粹为了报复游击队的袭击，抓了一批人质，其中抽到死签的将被处决。主人公抽到了死签，但表示要以自己的财产换取替代者，有一个身患绝症的小伙子同意交换，条件是主人公用自己的财产照料他的家人。后来主人公与小伙子的姐姐走到了一起。　　该片讲的是德军入侵法国的故事. 残暴的德军肆意在巴黎的街道上逮捕行人, 把他们带去他们的集中营,进行他们的杀人游戏.　　故事的男主角是镇上有名的律师, 有自己的律师事务所, 有宏伟的别墅, 家财万贯, 却独身一人. 一天午餐后, 他不幸被逮捕送去了可怕的集中营. 一路上, 他拿出他有钱人的质疑, 一直在反抗. 结果不说也知道, 挨了一顿打的他和其他人一样住进了三十人一间的牢房里. 他仍不相信这样的事实, 不安分的他一直和同伴们抱怨.　　游戏终于开始了. "你们每十个人中要死一个, 这次你们自己选出三个来, 明天一早执行枪决." 他们面面相觑, 却很平静. 最后商议的结果是抓阄, 大家很默然, 麻木, 只有他一直处于极度的恐惧和不安中. 他用颤抖的双手小心翼翼的打开他用自己的手抓来的这张纸条, 只需一眼就知道了自己的命运, 他抽到了最后一个叉号.　　他害怕了, 愤怒了.开始大声叫唤, 没有人理他, 这是他的命. 他开始喃喃自语, 开始想办法挽救他的生命. "谁跟我换, 我给他十万法郎." 没有人啃声. 他声音颤抖, 面目狰狞, 一遍一遍的说. "别傻了,谁会拿生命去换金钱." "就是, 没有生命了还要金钱干什么?" "你能不能安静点, 每个人都得死." 突然角落里的一个声音蹦出来"如果你的价码再多一些的话, 我会考虑."还伴着两声咳嗽声. 那是个面黄肌瘦, 身体羸弱的年轻人, 有气无力的躺在冰冷的地上. "我还有房产和花园, 我都给你.我把我所有的资产都给你, 总共三十万法郎." 律师迫不及待的说. 年轻人听后很满意, "我要把他们留给我的妈妈和姐姐, 我要让村子里的人都羡慕他们. 我要立个遗嘱." 就在他们忙着立遗嘱,写财产转让书,并找了两个人做为公证人签名做证时, 其他人都傻眼了..... 。

　　本剧讲述了东京发生骇人听闻的连续杀人案，新闻节目导演筒井万琴（岸井雪乃 饰）在采访时邂逅了神秘记者设乐浩晖（志尊淳 饰）。浩晖率先报道案件，并将其命名为“荷鲁斯之眼杀人事件”。受害者皆为女性，公司职员，每月特定日期被残忍杀害，双眼戴上不同颜色的隐形眼镜。万琴与浩晖立场相悖，却在调查中渐生情愫。然而，这场相遇却是通往黑暗的入口。浩晖究竟是揭露真相的记者，还是隐藏在暗处的连环杀手？一场信任与怀疑交织的禁忌之恋就此展开。

　　當活着比死更需勇氣，十二個少年來到荒廢醫院，進行本以為是12 比0 的投票，通過後便可集體自殺，卻發現房間多了一具屍體，必須找出兇手和企圖破壞契約的潛入者。劇情以新本格派推理展開，同時進行「十二怒漢」式針鋒相對。原來再厭世，內心極渴望別人聆聽自己故事。每一個都可疑，每一個都隨時被說服，結局示範最令人心悅誠服的反轉。《20 世紀少年》（2008-09）、《愛的成人式》（2015）導演堤幸彥巧妙觸碰少年自殺的禁忌，像補完計劃般置諸死地，在絕望深淵，一次擁抱可拯救一個靈魂。